- Original Paper
- Open access
- Published:
Mixture of biochar as a green additive in cement-based materials for carbon dioxide sequestration
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Engineering volume 19, Article number: 27 (2024)
Abstract
Cement production for concrete is one of the main reasons why the building industry contributes significantly to carbon dioxide emissions. This paper investigates an innovative approach to utilizing CO2 by incorporating mixed biochar in mortar. Various dosages (0%, 3%, 5%, and 10%) of mixed biochar were explored to assess their impact on the structural properties and environmental sustainability. In this study, mixed biochar was prepared using the pyrolysis method, in which biomasses (rice husk and sawdust) were heated in the absence of oxygen for 2 h in a muffle furnace at the heating rate of 10 ℃/min to 550 ℃ with a 2-h holding time. The replacement of biochar was done with cement in a mortar mixture for casting the cubes followed by putting them in the carbonation chamber for 28 days curing. After that, the cured samples were tested for mechanical strength, porosity, density, and water absorption. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that biochar supplementation promoted cement hydration products. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) analysis showed that several cement hydrates such as C-S–H, Ca(OH)2, and CaCO3 were formed with different doses of biochar and increased mechanical strength. Addition of 10 wt. % biochar increased the compressive strength of the composite by 24.2% than the control respectively, and successfully promoted the CO2 sequestration with 6% CO2 uptake after 28 days of accelerated CO2 curing. The present research has shown the benefits of optimally integrating mixed biochar with cement in the development of low-carbon, sustainable cementitious materials that have the potential to convert building materials like concrete in the future.
Introduction
Cement is a crucial construction material used worldwide in building infrastructure because of its unique benefits, in construction industries as compared to the other construction materials (Wu et al. 2022). It is the most demanded and easily available construction material, due to its low cost and high strength. But the industries that make cement, are a big source of carbon pollution. Reducing carbon dioxide emissions from cement is a major challenge because cement factories are among the main contributors to carbon dioxide emissions when they transform limestone into clinker through a chemical process. The construction and building industries together are majorly responsible for the generation of around 39% of carbon footprints (www.outlookindia.com. 2024). Every year, each person in India utilizes an average of 2.3 metric tons of cement. In India, the cement manufacturing industry releases 149 million metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, as per 2021 data (Ribeiro et al. 2022; Bhandari et al. 2023). Overall, the cement industry has contributed 8% of total CO2 emissions globally (Liang et al. 2020). Various International agencies have set a goal to achieve zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse anthropogenic gas, which urgently needs to be captured, stored, and reduced. Researchers suggested that if the demand for cement goes down, it could lead to a reduction in the pollution produced during its manufacturing. They investigated the possibility of blending it with various waste materials such as silica fume, biochar, fly ash, free lime, slag, and many more, which helps in lowering carbon dioxide emissions. These materials not only lower the carbon dioxide emission produced by cement but also improve the cement’s durability and performance. Using eco-friendly materials for constructing buildings, like biochar, has a minimal impact on the environment in terms of carbon emissions (Yaashikaa et al. 2020; Nighot and Kumar 2023). The use of biochar is one of the most economical and affordable methods for carbon dioxide sequestration. The process of carbonation curing can generate a hydration product, which then transforms into stable carbonate (Gupta et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2022) biochar can speed up the carbonation process due to its improved pore structure, biochar has great chemical stability and low thermal conductivity because of this it is a suitable building material, the pores structure of biochar contributes to its less thermal conductivity enhance the insulation of structure and it also helps to reduce the amount of energy needed to heat and cool the structure (Wang et al. 2020). Additionally incorporating biochar as a cement additive not only reduces carbon footprint but also has the potential to encourage the recycling of waste and to greatly reduce the land needed for waste disposal (Mohamad et al. 2022; Song et al. 2023; Suarez-Riera et al. 2020). Figure 1 shows the annual CO2 evolution in India due to industries (Ritchie et al. 2020).
Biochar is a carbon-rich sustainable material, obtained by the pyrolysis of biomass at a moderate temperature (550 ℃) in the presence of limited or no oxygen in a muffle furnace. Figure 2 shows year year-wise generation of biochar in India (Rahman et al. 2017; Munagala et al. 2022). After pyrolysis, all the volatile matter that was present in biomass will evaporate and only black carbon-rich solid matter is left, which is known as biochar. It possesses the ability to reduce the impact of climate change by capturing and storing carbon dioxide (Rahman et al. 2017).
Biochar has gained a lot of popularity in recent years among researchers because of its properties like its large surface area, high porosity, and stability, which make it a versatile material suitable for various uses. Biochar not only boosts the carbon-capturing ability but also enhances the mechanical characteristics of cement by speeding up the process of hydration (Sinha et al. 2023; Lin et al. 2023). It contributes to enhancing the mechanical strength (both flexural and compressive), physical characteristics, and water absorption of cement. The inclusion of biochar in cement improves the hydration procedure of the cementitious composite. Figure 3 shows the utilization of different types of biomasses as supplementary cementitious material (Liang et al. 2023; Aman et al. 2022; Ali et al. 2023). Table 1 represents the % CO2 uptake of different types of biomasses. A compact internal structure and increased compressive strength are achieved by gradually utilizing the absorption of biochar by water in the curing process of the cementitious product (Agarwal et al. 2023; Mensah et al. 2021). It was projected that the fracture resistance and bending capacity of the biochar-based cement composite may be increased because particles might absorb cracking force in the cementitious composite (Liang et al. 2023).
Little and late research has been done on the effectiveness of biochar in cementitious materials for sequestering carbon. There is still significant debate about the complementary effectiveness of biochar cement-based materials for sequestering carbon, particularly the relative contribution of different methods. Therefore, more comprehensive research is needed to understand how cement-based materials and biochar work together to sequester carbon. Future studies should also address the issue of corrosion caused by carbonation at later stages. Subsequent investigations ought to concentrate on the pragmatic utilization of materials derived from biochar cement. With attributes including low combustion, low thermal conductivity, and minimizing weight without degrading the mechanical performance of cement-based composites.
Most of the researchers have studied carbonation curing in cementitious material with individual biochar such as rice husk, sawdust, wheat, and pine needle; however, the addition of different compositions of biochar has not yet been studied. The performance impact of replacing mixed biochar with cement-based products that have undergone carbonation curing remains unclear as of yet. In the present study, biochar was prepared through the process of pyrolysis at 550 ℃ within the limited supply of oxygen using a mixture of rice husk and saw dust biomasses. The obtained mixed biochar was then incorporated in the cement mortar and characterized using XRD, FESEM, and CO2 uptake was calculated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).
Material and methods
Materials
This experimental program contained a test on mortar-based material cubes which is incorporated by biochar at various percentages. Biochar is a mixture of 50% of rice husk and 50% of sawdust. Rice husk was collected from the rice mill, and sawdust was collected from the plywood industry at the Roorkee’s local market, Uttarakhand, India. Standard sand (Grade III) is used to assess the quality of cement. Cement (Ordinary Portland cement) of grade 43 was purchased from the Roorkee’s local market, Uttarakhand, India. The standard chemical composition of ordinary Portland cement (OPC-43) is given in Tables 2 and 3.
Mix proportions and sample preparation
Preparation of biochar
A carbon-enriched biomaterial known as biochar is created when biomass is burned in a procedure known as pyrolysis. In pyrolysis, biomass (such as crop and forestry wastes, manure, and municipal and industrial wastes) is heated at temperatures higher than 400 °C in the presence of limited or no oxygen. As previously reported by Ghani et. al. (Ghani et al. 2013) pyrolysis at 500–550 ℃ leads to the decomposition of hemicellulose and cellulose, which are the major source of sugars harmful to the hydration of cement. Also, Parihar et al. (Parihar et al. 2017) demonstrated that pyrolysis at 500–550 °C can eliminate the generation of alcohol, phenol, and methylene groups, which are detrimental to the physical stability of cementitious matrix. Pyrolysis temperature variance studied by Chen et al. (Chen et al. 2022b) also showed that 500–550 ℃ is the most efficient temperature for pyrolysis. In this study, rice husk and sawdust were used for making biochar. The rice husk and sawdust were dried at 60 ℃ without any pre-treatment (washing) until a constant weight was achieved. A mixture of 500 g of sawdust biomass and 500 g of rice husk biomass were heated at a temperature of 550 ℃ with a heating rate of 10 ℃/min and 2 h of holding time in a muffle furnace in a limited oxygen environment condition. A normal programmable heating furnace was used during the pyrolysis of the biochar it does not influence any properties of the biochar. Consistent quality of biochar was obtained by maintaining the same heating rate (10 ℃/min), holding time (2 h), and oxygen-free environment in the furnace. A grinder mixer was used to grind the biochar into very fine particles.
A crucial component of biochar “design” that has gotten far less study attention is particle size. Given that smaller biochar particles would inevitably have more physical contact with soil particles, it is anticipated that particle size will have a significant impact on interactions between soil and biochar (Sigua et al. 2014). According to Chen et al. (Chen et al. 2017), biochar with a greater ash concentration that is produced from smaller feedstock particles generally has liming effects that are amplified. Additionally, there is proof that biochar containing finer particles can improve the sorption of organic compounds and nutrients (Xie et al. 2015). Biochar’s capacity to absorb and exchange nutritional ions is mostly determined by its micro-porosity, surface areas, and exterior surface areas; so, biochar with smaller particle sizes may have better nutrient availability for plants. RHB and SDB mixed biochar particle size is shown in Fig. 4.
Preparation of biochar-based mortar cubes
In this experiment, the sample cubes were prepared, by mixing mortar paste with biochar (rice husk and sawdust). In the mortar mixture, Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was replaced by 0%, 3%, 5%, and 10% of different dosages of mixture biochar (rice husk and sawdust). As reported by Gupta et. al., a 3% dosage of biochar provided an optimum strengthening of specimens, followed by a 5% dosage. In comparison, a 1% dosage of biochar had a relatively minor effect on compressive strength. To make the paste, a biochar-based mortar mixture was mixed with water. 50 mm × 50 mm × 50 mm molds were used for making the cube samples. The prepared sample was filled into the molds, and by using a vibration table all the cubes were compacted and kept for 24 h. After 24 h of drying, casted cubes were de-molded and placed in a carbonation chamber for 28 days for carbon curing as shown in Fig. 5. After 7 and 28 days, the incorporated biochar-based mortar sample cubes were taken out from the carbonation chamber and tested.
Test methods
Phenolphthalein test
To determine the carbonation depth in carbonated biochar-based mortar cubes traditional phenolphthalein test is used. Cubes of various dosages of biochar-based mortar were prepared and placed in a carbonation chamber for 28 days. Phenolphthalein indicator was sprayed on the broken surface of concrete and left for 5 to 10 min. This technique records the difference in color between concrete that is completely carbonated, moderately carbonated, and non-carbonated. Phenolphthalein is a commonly used chemical compound used as a pH indicator. It becomes pink in basic solutions (non-carbonated) and remains colorless in acidic ones (carbonated).
Mechanical strength
The mechanical strength test was done in accordance with the standard method (IS 4031–1988 Part 6, 1988). The compressive strength of cement is the property of cement which specifies how much load it can withstand when cement is made into hardened mass mixing with standard sand and water. The compressive strength of casted mortar paste cubes was 50 mm × 50 mm × 50 mm in size, in addition to a mix of biochar (rice husk and sawdust) of 0%, 3%, 5%, and 10% were evaluated. The compressive strength of the cubes was tested by CTM (compressive testing machine) by the force applied to the cross-section area of the cube. It is given in Eq. (1):
Porosity
After performing the compressive test, the crushed samples were placed in Acetone chemical and covered by paraffin wax parafilm for 24 h to determine the wet weight (A) of the samples. After 24 h, the samples were taken out from the Acetone chemical and placed in the oven for drying at 50 ℃ for 24 h. The dry weight of the samples was determined (B). The porosity of the biochar-based mortar cubes is determined by the Eq. (2).
Density
The density of the mortar incorporated with mixed biochar was done in accordance with ASTM C642–13 (1997). The cubes were taken out from the carbonation chamber after days of carbon dioxide curing. Determine the mass of the cubes (M) and also determine the volume of the cubes (V). After that, the density of the cubes is calculated by using Eq. (3).
Water absorption
The water absorption of the mortar incorporated with mixed biochar was done in accordance with ASTM C642–13 (1997). The cured biochar-based mortar specimen was placed in an oven and dried at a certain temperature (100 ℃–110 ℃) for 24 h. After 24 h, the specimens were taken out from the oven, and the dry weight (A) of each sample was determined. All the specimens were placed in water for the next 24 h. After 24 h, the samples were taken out of the water, and each sample surface was cleaned with dry cotton clothes. The wet weight (B) of each specimen was determined.
Water absorption is calculated by Eq. (4)
XRD (X-ray powder diffraction) analysis
X-ray powder diffraction (Make: Rigaku, Japan and Model: D-Max 2200) is a recognized methodology in cement chemistry that gives detailed information about the mineralogical composition and crystallographic structure of the crystalline materials. An entire spectrum of diffraction angles concerning the corresponding incident angle is used to identify the material. The system was operated under a Ni filter at room temperature, with an optimized diffraction angle range of 5˚–80˚ (2θ).
FESEM (field emission scanning electron microscope) analysis
FESEM is a technique for visualizing minute topography and elemental characteristics on the surface of whole or fractioned objects. Electrons are accelerated in a strong electrical field gradient after being liberated from a field emission source. Electronic lenses focus the original electrons from the electron beam to create narrow, secondary electrons that are related to the object's surface structure. A detector catches the secondary electrons and generates an electrical signal. This signal is amplified and transformed into either a video scan image that can be viewed on a monitor or a digital image that can be saved and analyzed.
Thermogravimetric differential thermal (TG/DTA) analysis
Thermo-gravimetric/differential thermal analysis involves two different techniques TG (thermo-gravimetric) and DTA (differential thermal analysis). TGA measures the thermal stability and in DTA, the temperature change occurs during heating concerning inert material under identical conditions. It evaluates sample weight changes due to oxidation, decomposition, and any other physical or chemical processes that cause weight gain or loss. The analysis of biochar-based mortar samples was carried out with the help of Thermogravimetric analysis (Make and Model: LINSEIS and STAPT 1600). The sample was heated from 50 to 1000 ℃ at a temperature range of 20 ℃/min. in the presence of a nitrogen atmosphere.
Based on the obtained curve the cement hydration product has been determined by using Eq. (5):
% CH Product:
where CHdx is the percentage of calcium hydroxide and dx mass loss of decarboxylation.
% CaCO3 Product:
The percentage of CaCO3 is determined from the Eq. (6).
CO2 uptake % is calculated from TGA curves, i.e., Weight loss % between 500 and 800 ℃
Results and discussion
Phenolphthalein test
Figure 6 shows the phenolphthalein test of the control sample and biochar-based mortar sample after 28 days of carbonation. As compared to the control sample (cube: a) biochar-based mortar sample (cube: b, c, d) is more carbonated because the presence of biochar provides more space for CO2 to react with hydrated compounds. It is especially helpful since it provides a visual representation of a continuous carbonation front. The colorless area shows the carbonated area of the cube and the pink color shows, the area which is not carbonated.
Mechanical strength of biochar-based mortar cubes
The data presented in Fig. 7 shows the effect of biochar as a replacement of cement in mortar strength with different dosages (0%, 3%, 5%, and 10%), after 28 days of carbon curing. The strength of cement slurries mixed with different dosages of biochar increases as the biochar wt. % increases from 0 to 10%. Compared to the control sample after 28 days of carbonation, at 3 wt. % and 5 wt. %, and 10 wt. % the compressive strength increased by 11%, 23.2%, and 24.2% respectively. The increase in compressive strength can be credited to the significant production of calcite in biochar cement composites. The transformation from Calcium hydroxide to Calcium carbonate occurs as a result of carbonation during the solidification of CO2. Biochar made from wood and food waste has been shown to increase strength because of its higher absorption capacity. This lowers the binder ratio and creates a denser microstructure. This improved strength is also thought to be a result of the biochar's capacity to refine the microstructure and plug pores. In addition, all mortar mixtures including biochar became stronger with time, suggesting that the hydration process would not be negatively impacted. In order to produce their separate biochar, Wadud et al. (Javed et al. 2022) carried out extensive studies utilizing five different bio-based feedstocks: rice husk, bagasse, coconut husk, wheat husk, and peanut husk. After that, different proportions of cement were substituted with these biochars. Their results showed that the greatest improvement in compressive strength, a noteworthy 18% gain, was seen in concrete mortars containing a 2% weight addition of bagasse biochar. According to the study, biochar variations that contained more amorphous silica were more successful in increasing compressive strength. According to Gupta et al. (Dixit et al. 2019), adding various sizes of biochar to ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) resulted in a small drop in strength, with larger biochar particles producing more noticeable reductions. This is because smaller biochar particles have a larger pore-filling capacity and are more reactive. The study conducted by Chen et al. (Wang et al. 2020) about the temperature at which biochar pyrolyzes revealed no noteworthy variations in the strength of carbon-cured concrete blocks when the biochar was treated at 500 °C or 700 °C. On the other hand, adding 1% biochar to Portland cement resulted in a 10% strength improvement, which was explained by the biochar speeding up the hydration reaction during carbon dioxide curing. Because biochar is a brittle material, higher dosages of it weaken the material and increase the risk of fissures. For improved compression strength results, Kua et al. (Gupta and Kua 2018) advise moist curing composites and pre-soaking biochar. Because the pre-soaked biochar acts as an internal curing agent in the composite and adds more water for hydration, the compression strength of the material is increased. Because of its porous structure, which permits it to retain water, biochar can act as an internal curing agent.
Porosity of biochar-based mortar cubes
The data presented in Fig. 8 shows the effect of biochar as a replacement of cement in a mortar with different dosages (0%, 3%, 5%, and 10%) after 28 days of carbon curing on the porosity of the samples. As biochar dosage increases in cement paste cubes, the porosity of the biochar-based mortar paste cubes is increased as compared to the control sample. The reason may be attributed to the porous nature of biochar, which results in an increase in sample porosity. After 28 days of curing, as compared to the control sample, the porosity of 3 wt. %, 5 wt. %, and 10 wt. % biochar-based mortar cubes, increased by 52%, 62%, and 69%. In biochar-based mortar cubes, the porosity increases as biochar dosage increases because the total porosity increases in the cement matrix and biochar.
Density of biochar-based mortar cubes
The density of the cement paste containing biochar (rice husk and sawdust biochar) was determined as per ASTM C642-97, after 28 days in Fig. 9. As biochar increases in mortar paste, the density of the biochar-based mortar cubes is reduced as compared to the control specimen. In cases of 3%, 5%, and 10 wt. % of biochar, there is a significant decrease in density by 2.5%, 3.3%, and 3.9% when compared to the control specimen. Small air holes that take up space in the cement matrix are comparable to biochar pores. The porosity of the biomass biochar increases as the amount of biochar increases. The density of biochar-based mortar cubes decreases due to the effective porosity increases as shown in Fig. 7.
Water absorption of biochar-based mortar cubes
As per ASTM C642-97 (1997), the water absorption of mortar paste containing biochar was evaluated in Fig. 10 following a 28-day carbonation curing period. As compared to the control sample, the water absorption increases with an increased amount of biochar (0, 3, 5, and 10 wt. %), in the mortar mixture. After 28 days of carbonation, the water absorption at 0, 3, 5, and 10 wt. % increased by 43%, 59%, and 69% respectively. This is because the density of the mortar cube changes as the amount of biochar increases, and the pores in the biochar act as tiny air pockets that take up space in the cement matrix. The quantity of empty pores in cement did, however, rise as the biochar level did. Consequently, the incorporation of biochar influences important pore structure characteristics in mortars, like water absorption and apparent porosity, which significantly influence the durability and strength of cement composites. The results meet ASTM C1403-15 (2015) requirements.
XRD analysis of biochar-based mortar cubes
Figure 11 depicts the XRD patterns of a carbonated cement paste containing biochar at 28 days. Hydration products, including calcite (CaCO3) and calcium hydroxide (CH), are seen at 2θ = 29.40° and 18°, 35° respectively. Calcite peak increased with increasing biochar dosage in cement paste. Simultaneously, the CH peak decreased as biochar dosage increased. After 28 days in carbonated samples, the calcite intensity was enhanced. After 28 days, the biochar’s pores filled with water, which quickly combined with CO2 to generate carbonic acid. The carbonic acid then reacted with calcium hydroxide to form calcite. The biochar replacement of cement in mortar paste increased the amount of calcium carbonate in the mixture. This suggests that the addition of CO2-saturated biochar to cement paste results in a larger fraction of calcium carbonate being produced. Based on the CH and calcite intensities seen in the XRD spectra, it is possible to conclude that calcium carbonate is the result of the carbonization of biochar and cement paste, which is a component of the calcium hydroxide generated during hydration. The results obtained suggest that the inclusion of biochar in the cement-based material significantly enhances the cement’s hydration degree.
TG/DTA analysis of biochar-based mortar cubes
After 28 days, carbonated samples were subjected to TGA analysis to ascertain the hydration and carbonated products in the cementitious materials. Three notable weight losses were observed at various temperature ranges as shown in Fig. 12. Dehydration of C-S–H between 105 °C and 150 °C is the cause of the initial weight loss. The second is brought on by the calcium hydroxide hydration product breaking down, which is further identified by Eq. (5) and is at the dihydroxylation temperature between 400 °C and 500 °C. Because of carbonated products, the third weight loss (in percentage) was seen between 500 °C and 800 °C. The carbonation of calcium hydroxide results in calcite breakdown, which was represented by mass loss in the 500–800 °C range. Equation (6) was used to determine the percentage of CaCO3 and % of CO2 uptake. At 10 wt. % of biochar the CO2 uptake was maximum, which was 6%. % CH and %CO2 uptake w.r.t to biochar % of biochar-based mortar sample were shown in Fig. 13. As biochar increases, % uptake of CO2 increases, corresponding to calcium hydroxide decreases. It means that the calcium carbonate is higher due to consumption of calcium hydroxide from 7.02 to 2.42% corresponding to 0% to 10%. Due to the porous structure and presence of basic functional groups biochar is being considered as an effective CO2 adsorbent (Lahijani et al. 2018; Chia et al. 2015). The mechanism of CO2 adsorption is dependent on physical and chemical adsorption. Specifically, the physisorption of CO2 between biochar and surface functional groups depends mostly on surface area and pore structure, whereas chemisorption relies primarily on the Lewis acid–base interaction (Serafin et al. 2017). Due to overlapping adsorption forces and potential fields from nearby pore walls, narrow micropores are closer to the dynamic diameter of CO2 molecules and have a higher attraction to CO2. This is why biochar’s CO2 capture capability is dependent on micropores less than 1 nm in diameter (Li et al. 2022). Micropores act as the packing space for CO2 adsorption, mesopores facilitate mass transfer at the gas–solid interface, and macropores improve CO2 diffusion to lessen pressure drop (Shen and Fan 2013). According to Angin et al. (Angın 2013), micropores had a smaller effect on adsorption capacity at high temperatures, and as temperatures rose beyond 500 °C, biochar’s pore volume and micropores shrank (Walton et al. 2006; Guo et al. 2022). It was explained by the fact that, at high temperatures, the process of pore enlargement and adjacent pores coalescing with a decrease in pore volume takes precedence over micropores. Biochar’s ability to adsorb CO2 can be improved by raising the surface’s alkalinity, which modifies the functional groups on the surface to improve the interaction with CO2, or by lowering the O and H content of the biochar, which contributes to its high hydrophobicity and low polarity. According to Zhang et al. (2022); Gomes et al. (2021 and Kamal et al. (2020), cementitious composites which include concrete, mortar, and bricks are thought to be the CO2 reservoir used in the carbonation process to capture carbon dioxide (Praneeth et al. 2020). The main mechanism is that the reaction between calcium hydroxide and absorbed carbon dioxide produces stable precipitation of calcium carbonate (Li et al. 2022), resulting in desirable CO2 capture. In general, the CO2 sequestration is achieved via the following equations (Eqs. (7, 8, 9)):
Studies by Chen et. al. (Chen et al. 2022b) and Zhang et al. (Zhang et al. 2022) in the past decade have focused on the optimization of concrete mixtures to reduce the ecological footprint by applying different supplementary cementitious materials. The application of biochar has gained attention due to its larger surface area and porous structure. Several researchers (Gupta et al. (Gupta et al. 2020); Dixit et. al. (Dixit and Verma 2021), Praneeth et al. (Praneeth et al. 2020); Zhang et al. (Zhang et al. 2022)) reported that the main advantage of biochar in improving carbon sequestration was that the porous structure of biochar provided reaction site for the formation of calcium carbonate.
FESEM analysis of biochar-based mortar cubes
The morphology of the carbonated biochar incorporated mortar paste sample after 28 days is shown in Fig. 14a–d. The FESEM study shows the hydration products, like CH, C-S–H, and calcite morphologies, among others. Calcium silicate hydrate (C-S–H) is the primary binder component. Nevertheless, C-S–H binds the particles of biochar to the cement paste and enhances strength only when it is integrated into the cement matrix. Figure 14 b–d shows the growth of hydration products in the biochar pores. Incorporation of biochar in the mortar samples and 28 days of carbonation curing has led to increase or enhancement in the hydration products such as crystalline calcium hydroxide (CH), ettringite crystals (AFt), and calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S–H) in contrast to control samples (Dixit and Verma 2021). Greater hydration products increase the strength of the cement containing biochar and improve the pore structure, decreasing the porosity and the volume of macropores. Moreover, the micro filler effect of biochar fills the voids and cracks showing enhancement in the effectiveness of samples. According to Goldman et. al. (1994), the paste is strengthened more by the inert carbon black micro-filler than by the pozzolanic activity. Moreover, because biochar is hydrophilic, adding it lowers the effective water-to-cement ratio. Calcite is a reactive material that modifies the mineralogy of wet cement pastes by influencing the distribution of lime, alumina, and sulfate. Formation of calcite in the biochar-incorporated system of mortar leads to an increase in the strength of the samples as the calcium hydroxide reacts with the CO2 present and results in the formation of calcium carbonate. As the amount of biochar increased up to 10 wt.%, a denser structure of calcite and hydration products was found. These results showed that CO2-cured biochar-based mortar cubes are compatible with cement paste.
CO2 emissions
The literature values for corresponding CO2 emission equivalent values for OPC (Turner and Collins 2013), water (Crawford et al. 2019), and fine aggregates (Crawford et al. 2019) were taken. In this study, carbon emissions caused by the transportation and processing of rice and sawdust are considered since the industry burns these biomasses as fuel. For RHB and SDB, the CO2 emissions were calculated according to the method described by references (Alnahhal et al. 2018). RH and SD were collected from the local area of Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India. The distance between the site and the laboratory where the casting and testing were done is roughly 10 km.
Control and mixed biochar incorporated mortar were used to calculate the ECO2e/kg by using Eq. (10) (Selvaranjan et al. 2021).
CO2i is the embodied carbon emission factor, and mi corresponds to the mass of mortar ingredient i per kg of mortar.
Mortar with RHB and SDB in 3, 5, and 10% proportions as a replacement for cement was evaluated for their environmental efficacy. Compared to control mortar, RHB and SDB mortars contribute less greenhouse gas emissions, making them environmentally friendly. The derived results are illustrated in Fig. 15. RHB and SDB incorporation into mortar clearly affects the difference obtained for ECO2e for different mortars. The ECO2e of blended mortar is 2.3%, 3.8%, and 7.7% less than that of the control mortar at 3%, 5%, and 10% of OPC replaced with RHB and SDB.
Conclusion
This study investigated the impact of SDB and RHB replacement with cement in mortar mixture on improving mechanical, physical, and environmental sustainability. The biochar prepared from rice husk and sawdust was incorporated into mortar-based as a replacement of cement with different dosages and cured under a CO2 environment. After 28 days of carbonation curing mechanical and mineralogical studies were conducted with the following conclusion:
-
1.
As compared to the control sample, the replacement of 3, 5, and 10 wt. % of biochar in mortar mixture increased the compressive strength by 11%, 23.2%, and 24.2% in 28 days.
-
2.
With replacement of 3, 5, and 10 wt.% of biochar with cement in mortar mixture affects its physical properties such as water absorption increases by 43%, 59%, and 69%, density decreases by 4.79%, 8.87%, and 10.65% and porosity increases by 52%, 62%, and 69%, as compared to the control sample.
-
3.
TGA analysis of carbonated samples shows, that 10% of biochar incorporated in mortar mixture reduces the formation of calcium hydroxide by 65% and increases the formation of calcite product. XRD analysis of the carbonated sample shows higher calcite and C-S–H formation.
Therefore, to improve the properties of composites based on cement and promote carbon dioxide sequestration, waste rice husk biochar and sawdust biochar and CO2 curing should be synergistically integrated. In the future, this approach could be employed to manufacture construction materials in a more environmentally friendly and economically valuable manner.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Agarwal R, Pawar N, Rawat P, Rai D, Kumar R (2023) Thermo-mechanical behavior of cementitious material with partial replacement of lass-II biochar with Accelerated Carbonation Curing (ACC). Ind Crops Prod 204:117335
Ali D et al (2023) Thermo-physical properties and microstructural behaviour of biochar-incorporated cementitious material. J Build Eng 64:105695
Alnahhal MF, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ, Abutaha F, Alqedra MA, Nayaka RR (2018) Assessment on engineering properties and CO2 emissions of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating waste products as supplements to Portland cement. J Clean Prod 203:822–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.292
Aman AMN, Selvarajoo A, Lau TL, Chen W-H (2022) Biochar as cement replacement to enhance concrete composite properties: a review. Energies 15(20):7662
ASTM, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, ASTM C642–13, 1997
ASTM, Standard Test Method for Rate of Water Absorption of Masonry Mortars, ASTM C1403–15, 2015
Angın D (2013) Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on biochar obtained from pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake. Biores Technol 128:593–597
Chen J et al (2017) Response of microbial community structure and function to short-term biochar amendment in an intensively managed bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) plantation soil: effect of particle size and addition rate. Sci Total Environ 574:24–33
Chen L et al (2022) Biochar-augmented carbon-negative concrete. Chem Eng J 431:133946
Chen T, Zhao L, Gao X, Li L, Qin L (2022) Modification of carbonation-cured cement mortar using biochar and its environmental evaluation. Cement Concr Compos 134:104764
Chia CH, Downie A, Munroe P (2015) Characteristics of biochar: physical and structural properties, in Biochar for environmental management: Routledge, 2nd ed., pp. 89–109
Dixit A, Verma A, Dai Pang S (2021) Dual waste utilization in ultra-high performance concrete using biochar and marine clay. Cement Concr Compos 120:104049
Dixit A, Gupta S, Dai Pang S, Kua HW (2019) Waste Valorisation using biochar for cement replacement and internal curing in ultra-high performance concrete. J Clean Product 238:117876
Ghani WAWAK et al (2013) Biochar production from waste rubber-wood-sawdust and its potential use in C sequestration: chemical and physical characterization. Ind Crops Prod 44:18–24
Goldman A, Bentur A (1994) Properties of cementitious systems containing silica fume or nonreactive microfillers. Advanced Cement Based Materials 1(5) 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/1065-7355(94)90026-4
Gomes RI, Farinha CB, Veiga R, de Brito J, Faria P, Bastos D (2021) CO2 sequestration by construction and demolition waste aggregates and effect on mortars and concrete performance-an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 152:111668
Guo S, Li Y, Wang Y, Wang L, Sun Y, Liu L (2022) Recent advances in biochar-based adsorbents for CO2 capture. Carbon Capt Sci Technol 4:100059
Gupta S (2021) Carbon sequestration in cementitious matrix containing pyrogenic carbon from waste biomass: a comparison of external and internal carbonation approach. Journal of Building Engineering 43:102910
Gupta S, Kashani A (2021) Utilization of biochar from unwashed peanut shell in cementitious building materials–effect on early age properties and environmental benefits. Fuel Process Technol 218:106841
Gupta S, Kua HW (2018) Effect of water entrainment by pre-soaked biochar particles on strength and permeability of cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 159:107–125
Gupta S, Kua HW, Low CY (2018) Use of biochar as carbon sequestering additive in cement mortar. Cement Concr Compos 87:110–129
Gupta S, Krishnan P, Kashani A, Kua HW (2020) Application of biochar from coconut and wood waste to reduce shrinkage and improve physical properties of silica fume-cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 262:120688
Gupta S, Kashani A, Mahmood AH, Han T (2021) Carbon sequestration in cementitious composites using biochar and fly ash–ffect on mechanical and durability properties. Constr Build Mater 291:123363
Ritchie H, Rosado P, Roser M (2023) CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions
Bhandari I, Kumar R, Sofi A, Nighot NS (2023) A systematic study on sustainable low carbon cement–superplasticizer interaction: fresh, mechanical, microstructural and durability characteristics. Heliyon 9(9):19176.
Indian Standard, Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement, IS : 4031 (Part 6), 1988.
Indian Standard, Ordinary Portland cement, 43 Grade - specification, IS 8112-1989, 2013.
Javed MH, Sikandar MA, Ahmad W, Bashir MT, Alrowais R, Wadud MB (2022) Effect of various biochars on physical, mechanical, and microstructural characteristics of cement pastes and mortars. J Build Eng 57:104850
Kamal NLM, Itam Z, Sivaganese Y, Beddu S (2020) Carbon dioxide sequestration in concrete and its effects on concrete compressive strength. Materials Today: Proceed 31:A18–A21
Lahijani P, Mohammadi M, Mohamed AR (2018) Metal incorporated biochar as a potential adsorbent for high capacity CO2 capture at ambient condition. J CO2 Util 26:281–293
Li Y et al (2022) Synergy of developed micropores and electronic structure defects in carbon-doped boron nitride for CO2 capture. Sci Total Environ 811:151384
Liang C, Pan B, Ma Z, He Z, Duan Z (2020) Utilization of CO2 curing to enhance the properties of recycled aggregate and prepared concrete: a review. Cement Concr Compos 105:103446
Liang Q, Pan D, Zhang X (2023) Construction and application of biochar-based composite phase change materials. Chem Eng J 453:139441
Liu J, Liu G, Zhang W, Li Z, Xing F, Tang L (2022) Application potential analysis of biochar as a carbon capture material in cementitious composites: a review. Constr Build Mater 350:128715
Mensah RA et al (2021) Biochar-added cementitious materials—a review on mechanical, thermal, and environmental properties. Sustainability 13(16):9336
Mohamad N, Muthusamy K, Embong R, Kusbiantoro A, Hashim MH (2022) Environmental impact of cement production and solutions: a review. Materials Today: Proceed 48:741–746
Munagala M, Shastri Y, Nagarajan S, Ranade V (2022) Production of Bio-CNG from sugarcane bagasse: commercialization potential assessment in Indian context. Ind Crops Prod 188:115590
Nair JJ, Shika S, Sreedharan V (2020) Biochar amended concrete for carbon sequestration, in IOP Conference Series. Mat Sci Eng. 936(1):012007
Nighot NS, Kumar R (2023) A comprehensive study on the synthesis and characterization of eco-cementitious binders using different kind of industrial wastes for sustainable development. Develop Built Environ 14:100135
Parihar A, Sripada P, Bambery K, Garnier G, Bhattacharya S (2017) Investigation of functional group changes in biomass during slow pyrolysis using synchrotron based infra-red microspectroscopy and thermogravimetry-infra-red spectroscopy. J Anal Appl Pyrol 127:394–401
Praneeth S, Guo R, Wang T, Dubey BK, Sarmah AK (2020) Accelerated carbonation of biochar reinforced cement-fly ash composites: enhancing and sequestering CO2 in building materials. Constr Build Mater 244:118363
R. Crawford, A. Stephan, F. Prideaux, and P. Bontinck, Environmental performance in construction (EPiC). University of Melbourne. 2019. https://doi.org/10.26188/5dc228ef98c5a.
Rahman FA et al (2017) Pollution to solution: capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:112–126
Ribeiro FB, Do Nascimento FAC, da Silva MAV (2022) Environmental performance analysis of railway infrastructure using life cycle assessment: electing pavement projects based on global warming potential impacts. J Clean Product 365:132558
Selvaranjan K, Gamage JCPH, De Silva GIP, Navaratnam S (2021) Development of sustainable mortar using waste rice husk ash from rice mill plant: physical and thermal properties. J Build Eng 43:102614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102614
Serafin J, Narkiewicz U, Morawski AW, Wróbel RJ, Michalkiewicz B (2017) Highly microporous activated carbons from biomass for CO2 capture and effective micropores at different conditions. J CO2 Util 18:73–79
Shen W, Fan W (2013) Nitrogen-containing porous carbons: synthesis and application. J Mater Chem A 1(4):999–1013
Sigua GC et al (2014) Carbon mineralization in two ultisols amended with different sources and particle sizes of pyrolyzed biochar. Chemosphere 103:313–321
Sinha S, Pandey A, Prasad B (2023) A preliminary study of agricultural waste as biochar incorporated into cementitious materials: preliminary study of agricultural waste as biochar incorporated cementitious materials for concrete structure. J Architect Environ Struct Eng Res 6(2):59–79
Song S, Liu Z, Liu G, Cui X, Sun J (2023) Application of biochar cement-based materials for carbon sequestration. Constr Build Mater 405:133373
Suarez-Riera D, Restuccia L, Ferro G (2020) The use of biochar to reduce the carbon footprint of cement-based materials. Procedia Struct Integr 26:199–210
Turner LK, Collins FG (2013) Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 43:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023
Walton KS, Abney MB, LeVan MD (2006) CO2 adsorption in Y and X zeolites modified by alkali metal cation exchange. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 91(1–3):78–84
Wang L et al (2020) Biochar as green additives in cement-based composites with carbon dioxide curing. J Clean Prod 258:120678
Wu T, Ng ST, Chen J (2022) Deciphering the CO2 emissions and emission intensity of cement sector in China through decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 352:131627
www.outlookindia.com. The carbon footprint of the construction industry in India. https://www.outlookindia.com/business-spotlight/the-carbon-footprint-of-the-construction-industry-in-india-news-247342. Accessed 05 Jan 2024.
X. Lin, W. Li, Y. Guo, W. Dong, A. Castel, and K. Wang (2023) Biochar-cement concrete toward decarbonisation and sustainability for construction: characteristic, performance and perspective. J Cleaner Production 419:138219
Xie T, Reddy KR, Wang C, Yargicoglu E, Spokas K (2015) Characteristics and applications of biochar for environmental remediation: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45(9):939–969
Yaashikaa P, Kumar PS, Varjani S, Saravanan A (2020) A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnol Rep 28:e00570
Zhang Y, Chen H, Wang Q (2022) Accelerated carbonation of regenerated cementitious materials from waste concrete for CO2 sequestration. J Build Eng 55:104701
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the Director, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee for the sustained financial support to the project (Project No.: OLP-2216).
Funding
Director, CSIR-CBRI Roorkee (OLP-2216).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SK analysed and interpreted the results. Drafted the Manuscript. SS analysed and interpreted the results. Drafted the Manuscript. RA interpreted the results and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. NSN analysed and interpreted the results. RK supervised the experiments and drafted the Manuscript. HM drafted and revised the Manuscript. SNB supervised the experiments and drafted the Manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors give consent for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kushwah, S., Singh, S., Agarwal, R. et al. Mixture of biochar as a green additive in cement-based materials for carbon dioxide sequestration. J Mater. Sci: Mater Eng. 19, 27 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-024-00170-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-024-00170-y